[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13659091#comment-13659091
 ] 

Carlo Curino commented on YARN-624:
-----------------------------------

Alejandro, I completely agree gang scheduling is an important and missing use 
case.  As I told you in person, I spoke with various machine-learning guys and 
they are very interested in gang scheduling (they are working on their own AM 
for ML computations). From the conversation I am convinced their asks represent 
a rather common requirement for much of ML-type applications. In particular, 
they were interested in the "or" use-case you mentioned. 

Specifically they want to be able to express this:
1) 1 container with 128GB of RAM and 16cores OR
2) 10 containers with 16GB of RAM and 2 cores OR 
3) 100 containers with 2GB of RAM and 1 core

In term of locality I can see three main scenarios:
1) absolute locality, i.e., I need a gang of N containers on this rack, or on 
these set of nodes, 
2) relative locality, i.e., I need a gang of N containers "close to each other" 
(this really captures more of a network property than anything else)
3) (no locality), i.e., I need a gang of N containers anywhere in the cluster
  
                
> Support gang scheduling in the AM RM protocol
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-624
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-624
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: api, scheduler
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.4-alpha
>            Reporter: Sandy Ryza
>            Assignee: Sandy Ryza
>
> Per discussion on YARN-392 and elsewhere, gang scheduling, in which a 
> scheduler runs a set of tasks when they can all be run at the same time, 
> would be a useful feature for YARN schedulers to support.
> Currently, AMs can approximate this by holding on to containers until they 
> get all the ones they need.  However, this lends itself to deadlocks when 
> different AMs are waiting on the same containers.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to