[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15705599#comment-15705599
 ] 

Rohith Sharma K S commented on YARN-5921:
-----------------------------------------

oh.. that's fine. I am not sure about impact of using --amend. May be some kind 
of documentation for committers like FAQ would be good in wiki. 

> Incorrect synchronization in RMContextImpl#setHAServiceState/getHAServiceState
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-5921
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5921
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Varun Saxena
>            Assignee: Varun Saxena
>         Attachments: YARN-5921.01.patch, YARN-5921.02.patch
>
>
> Code in RMContextImpl is as under:
> {code:title=RMContextImpl.java|borderStyle=solid}
>   void setHAServiceState(HAServiceState haServiceState) {
>     synchronized (haServiceState) {
>       this.haServiceState = haServiceState;
>     }
>   }
>   public HAServiceState getHAServiceState() {
>     synchronized (haServiceState) {
>       return haServiceState;
>     }
>   }
> {code}
> As can be seen above, in setHAServiceState, we are synchronizing on the 
> passed haServiceState instead of haServiceState in RMContextImpl which will 
> not lead to desired effect. This does not seem to be intentional.
> We can use a RW lock or synchronize on some object here. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to