[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15819695#comment-15819695 ]
Andrew Wang commented on YARN-5825: ----------------------------------- Doing a release notes sweep for 3.0.0-alpha2, noticed this JIRA. If it's incompatible, should it have been committed to branch-2? Also, if this is incompatible, could someone also add a release note detailing the exposure? Thanks! > ProportionalPreemptionalPolicy could use readLock over LeafQueue instead of > synchronized block > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-5825 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5825 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug > Components: capacity scheduler > Reporter: Sunil G > Assignee: Sunil G > Fix For: 2.9.0, 3.0.0-alpha2 > > Attachments: YARN-5825.0001.patch, YARN-5825.0002.patch > > > Currently in PCPP, {{synchronized (curQueue)}} is used in various places. > Such instances could be replaced with a read lock. Thank you [~jianhe] for > pointing out the same as comment > [here|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?focusedCommentId=15626578&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15626578] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org