[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15885641#comment-15885641 ]
Sunil G commented on YARN-6164: ------------------------------- Thanks [~benson.qiu] for the patch There are some more high level thoughts after i was checking various CLI and other PBImpl code. # We are not sharing per-label Queue resource usage # We are not sharing per-label Queue configurations (capacity etc). More or less I am thinking in line of thoughts shared by [~bibinchundatt] earlier. bq.Since many informations related to configuration is already exposed by QueueInfo, Properties may not a become a better logical grouping unless we move all existing config items to new subclass. I still kind of feel above statement makes sense. However this is similar to a problem addressed in {{QueueCapacities}} etc. And in long run, this may be helpful. My proposal is something like below. In {{QueueInfo}}, lets have an api called {{setQueueConfigurations}}. A new api record could be added named {{QueueConfigurations}} and it can have below sub items # capacity # abs-capacity # max-capacity # abs-max-capacity # max-am-perc If we have a map in {{QueueInfo}} per-label, then {{QueueConfigurations}} could be mapped against its accessable-labels. I would like to have discussion on this approach and we can make it more generic. [~benson.qiu], [~bibinchundatt] and [~rohithsharma] , thoughts? > Expose maximum-am-resource-percent in YarnClient > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: YARN-6164 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6164 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 2.7.2 > Reporter: Benson Qiu > Assignee: Benson Qiu > Attachments: YARN-6164.001.patch, YARN-6164.002.patch, > YARN-6164.003.patch, YARN-6164.004.patch, YARN-6164.005.patch > > > `yarn.scheduler.capacity.maximum-am-resource-percent` is exposed through the > [Cluster Scheduler > API|http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-site/ResourceManagerRest.html#Cluster_Scheduler_API], > but not through > [YarnClient|https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/client/api/YarnClient.html]. > Since YarnClient and RM REST APIs depend on different ports (8032 vs 8088 by > default), it would be nice to expose `maximum-am-resource-percent` in > YarnClient as well. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org