[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16103963#comment-16103963
 ] 

Wangda Tan commented on YARN-6593:
----------------------------------

Thanks [~kkaranasos] for updating the patch, could you check the reported 
Javadocs warning?

In addition to that, some comments for API annotations:
1) Since we're in the early phase of the feature, instead of marking 
PlacementConstraint(s) to be public/evolving, I prefer to mark them to 
public/unstable.
2) private/evolving is not proper, private should come unstable or empty (Just 
like CapacitySchedulerConfiguration) always.
3) Do we really need to mark {{api/resource/package-info.java}} to public? It 
could accidentally add {{@public}} classes in the future 
4) A couple of {{static final}} fields in PlacementConstraint(s) should be 
{{@private}}, for example: {{PlacementConstraints#NODE/RACK}}.

> [API] Introduce Placement Constraint object
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-6593
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6593
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Konstantinos Karanasos
>            Assignee: Konstantinos Karanasos
>         Attachments: YARN-6593.001.patch, YARN-6593.002.patch, 
> YARN-6593.003.patch, YARN-6593.004.patch, YARN-6593.005.patch, 
> YARN-6593.006.patch
>
>
> Just removed Fixed version and moved it to target version as we set fix 
> version only after patch is committed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to