[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16110288#comment-16110288 ]
Jian He commented on YARN-6594: ------------------------------- On a second thought, if you think a set is more suitable for placement scheduling because it essentially has only one type, that is the PLACEMENT. I'm also fine to keep as-is. Essentially, the use-case is different, no need to be forced to be the same. I'll pursue what I need separately. > [API] Introduce SchedulingRequest object > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-6594 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6594 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Konstantinos Karanasos > Assignee: Konstantinos Karanasos > Attachments: YARN-6594.001.patch > > > This JIRA introduces a new SchedulingRequest object. > It will be part of the {{AllocateRequest}} and will be used to define sizing > (e.g., number of allocations, size of allocations) and placement constraints > for allocations. > Applications can use either this new object (when rich placement constraints > are required) or the existing {{ResourceRequest}} object. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org