[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16253721#comment-16253721 ]
Eric Payne commented on YARN-7469: ---------------------------------- bq. now min container is the dead zone here I filed YARN-7501 to include a "dead zone" around the user limit. bq. in 2.8, this fix has a problem of oscillation due to the difference in how user limit is calculated between 2.8 and later releases. [~sunilg], I think this patch should be used to fix the user starvation problem and the 2.8-specific oscillation problem can be handled by YARN-7496. {{YARN-7469.001.patch}} will apply cleanly to all branches back to branch-2.8. > Capacity Scheduler Intra-queue preemption: User can starve if newest app is > exactly at user limit > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-7469 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7469 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug > Components: capacity scheduler, yarn > Affects Versions: 2.9.0, 3.0.0-beta1, 2.8.2 > Reporter: Eric Payne > Assignee: Eric Payne > Attachments: UnitTestToShowStarvedUser.patch, YARN-7469.001.patch > > > Queue Configuration: > - Total Memory: 20GB > - 2 Queues > -- Queue1 > --- Memory: 10GB > --- MULP: 10% > --- ULF: 2.0 > - Minimum Container Size: 0.5GB > Use Case: > - User1 submits app1 to Queue1 and consumes 20GB > - User2 submits app2 to Queue1 and requests 7.5GB > - Preemption monitor preempts 7.5GB from app1. Capacity Scheduler gives those > resources to User2 > - User 3 submits app3 to Queue1. To begin with, app3 is requesting 1 > container for the AM. > - Preemption monitor never preempts a container. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org