[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16333135#comment-16333135
]
Sunil G commented on YARN-7774:
-------------------------------
Makes sense. Sorry, I missed that one. Could you also update the exception in
the same block, though maxCardinality check is != 0, exception message still
says != 1 in {{SingleConstraintAppPlacementAllocator}}. If any Jiras are abt to
commit, we can get this in or ll file a trivial one later.
> Miscellaneous fixes to the PlacementProcessor
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-7774
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7774
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Arun Suresh
> Assignee: Arun Suresh
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: YARN-6592
>
> Attachments: YARN-7774-YARN-6592.001.patch,
> YARN-7774-YARN-6592.002.patch, YARN-7774-YARN-6592.003.patch,
> YARN-7774-YARN-6592.004.patch, YARN-7774-YARN-6592.005.patch
>
>
> JIRA to track the following minor changes:
> * Scheduler must normalize requests that are made using the
> {{attemptAllocationOnNode}} method.
> * Currently, the placement algorithm resets the node iterator for each
> request. The Placement Algorithm should either shuffle the node iterator OR
> use a circular iterator - to ensure a) more nodes are looked at and b) bias
> against placing too many containers on the same node
> * Add a placement retry loop for rejected requests - since there are cases
> especially, when Constraints will be satisfied after a subsequent request has
> been placed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
