[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16424350#comment-16424350
 ] 

Vrushali C commented on YARN-6936:
----------------------------------

Do you both think we can have a quick call on tuesday night (pacific time) to 
chat about this particular issue? Perhaps at 10 pm on tuesday April 3rd Pacific 
time, same hangout as our regular call? That would be 10:30 am Wednesday April 
4th for you Rothih. We can be flexible, a few mins here or there.

> [Atsv2] Retrospect storing entities into sub application table from client 
> perspective
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-6936
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6936
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Rohith Sharma K S
>            Assignee: Rohith Sharma K S
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: YARN-6936.000.patch, YARN-6936.001.patch, 
> YARN-6936.002.patch
>
>
> Currently YARN-6734 stores entities into sub application table only if doAs 
> user and submitted users are different. This holds good for Tez kind of use 
> cases. But AM runs as same as submitted user like MR also need to store 
> entities in sub application table so that it could read entities without 
> application id. 
> This would be a point of concern later stages when ATSv2 is deployed into 
> production. This JIRA is to retrospect decision of storing entities into sub 
> application table based on client side configuration driven rather than user 
> driven. 
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to