[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13760172#comment-13760172 ]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-1049: --------------------------------- {color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12601813/YARN-1049.patch against trunk revision . {color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files. {color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. {color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with eclipse:eclipse. {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. {color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. {color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager. {color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/1855//testReport/ Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/1855//console This message is automatically generated. > ContainerExistStatus should define a status for preempted containers > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-1049 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1049 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug > Components: api > Affects Versions: 2.1.0-beta > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 2.1.1-beta > > Attachments: YARN-1049.patch > > > With the current behavior is impossible to determine if a container has been > preempted or lost due to a NM crash. > Adding a PREEMPTED exit status (-102) will help an AM determine that a > container has been preempted. > Note the change of scope from the original summary/description. The original > scope proposed API/behavior changes. Because we are passed 2.1.0-beta I'm > reducing the scope of this JIRA. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira