[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16555526#comment-16555526
 ] 

stefanlee commented on YARN-6307:
---------------------------------

thanks for this jira,[~yufeigu] [~templedf], I have a  doubt that what  is the 
difference  between *fair share* in _FairSharePolicy#compare_  and  *fair 
share* in  _FairSharePolicy#computeShares_, I think the latter is related to 
*preempt*. there are incomprehensible.

> Refactor FairShareComparator#compare
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-6307
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6307
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: fairscheduler
>            Reporter: Yufei Gu
>            Assignee: Yufei Gu
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.9.0, 3.0.0-beta1
>
>         Attachments: YARN-6307.001.patch, YARN-6307.002.patch, 
> YARN-6307.003.patch
>
>
> The method does three things: compare the min share usage, compare fair share 
> usage by checking weight ratio, break tied by submit time and name. They are 
> mixed with each other which is not easy to read and maintenance, poor style. 
> Additionally, there are potential performance issues, like no need to check 
> weight ratio if minShare usage comparison already indicate the order. It is 
> worth to improve considering huge amount invokings in scheduler.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to