[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli updated YARN-899: ----------------------------------------- Attachment: YARN-899.12.patch The patch looks good to me. The test is particularly impressive, great job! I'm doing a source formatting of the new test and doing away with using record-factories in the test. I'll commit this once Jenkins is okay. One other thing I noticed is that queue-acls as they are in the patch don't work well with hierarchical queues. In the interest of removing the regression from 1.0, I'll push this and track queue hierarchy separately. > Get queue administration ACLs working > ------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-899 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-899 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: scheduler > Affects Versions: 2.1.0-beta > Reporter: Sandy Ryza > Assignee: Xuan Gong > Attachments: YARN-899.10.patch, YARN-899.10.patch, YARN-899.11.patch, > YARN-899.12.patch, YARN-899.1.patch, YARN-899.2.patch, YARN-899.3.patch, > YARN-899.4.patch, YARN-899.5.patch, YARN-899.5.patch, YARN-899.6.patch, > YARN-899.7.patch, YARN-899.8.patch, YARN-899.9.patch > > > The Capacity Scheduler documents the > yarn.scheduler.capacity.root.<queue-path>.acl_administer_queue config option > for controlling who can administer a queue, but it is not hooked up to > anything. The Fair Scheduler could make use of a similar option as well. > This is a feature-parity regression from MR1. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)