[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13781293#comment-13781293
 ] 

Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli commented on YARN-899:
----------------------------------------------

bq. One other thing I noticed is that queue-acls as they are in the patch don't 
work well with hierarchical queues. In the interest of removing the regression 
from 1.0, I'll push this and track queue hierarchy separately.
Actually, they look like they already work. A queue-admin at any level queue 
can submit to and kill apps in any sub-queue. We just need to write tests.

> Get queue administration ACLs working
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-899
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-899
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: scheduler
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.0-beta
>            Reporter: Sandy Ryza
>            Assignee: Xuan Gong
>         Attachments: YARN-899.10.patch, YARN-899.10.patch, YARN-899.11.patch, 
> YARN-899.12.patch, YARN-899.1.patch, YARN-899.2.patch, YARN-899.3.patch, 
> YARN-899.4.patch, YARN-899.5.patch, YARN-899.5.patch, YARN-899.6.patch, 
> YARN-899.7.patch, YARN-899.8.patch, YARN-899.9.patch
>
>
> The Capacity Scheduler documents the 
> yarn.scheduler.capacity.root.<queue-path>.acl_administer_queue config option 
> for controlling who can administer a queue, but it is not hooked up to 
> anything.  The Fair Scheduler could make use of a similar option as well.  
> This is a feature-parity regression from MR1.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to