[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16662914#comment-16662914
 ] 

Wangda Tan commented on YARN-8895:
----------------------------------

[~youchen] , Thanks, I believe this will be a very useful Jira. My questions:

1) How to make it compatible. Typically we don't think changing "diagnostic" 
field is an incompatible change, however if everything changed, I would prefer 
to have a new field. 

2) What changes required to produce proposed structured msg.

> Improve YARN  Error diagnostics
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-8895
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8895
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Young Chen
>            Assignee: Young Chen
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Currently identifying error sources can be quite difficult, as they are 
> written into an unstructured string "diagnostics" field. This is present in 
> container statuses returned to the RM and in application attempts in the RM. 
> These errors are difficult to classify without hard-coding diagnostic string 
> searches.
> This Jira aims to add a structured error field in NM and RM that preserves 
> failure information and source component to enable faster and clearer error 
> diagnosis
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to