[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16752297#comment-16752297
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on YARN-9195:
---------------------------------

| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
20s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 3 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
14s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 22m 
24s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  8m 
59s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  1m 
35s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  2m 
47s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
17m 11s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} findbugs {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Skipped patched modules with no Java source: 
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-tests 
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  3m 
51s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m 
10s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
14s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  2m 
12s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  8m  
9s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  8m  
9s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}  
1m 30s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn: The patch 
generated 16 new + 296 unchanged - 0 fixed = 312 total (was 296) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  2m 
35s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 1s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green}  0m  
1s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
13m  7s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} findbugs {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Skipped patched modules with no Java source: 
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-tests 
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  4m 
10s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m  
5s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  0m 
50s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-api in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  3m 
32s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  3m  
9s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-server-tests in the patch passed. {color} 
|
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 26m 
57s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-yarn-client in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
39s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}126m 30s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:8f97d6f |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-9195 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12956332/YARN-9195.002.patch |
| Optional Tests |  dupname  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  
mvnsite  unit  shadedclient  findbugs  checkstyle  xml  |
| uname | Linux da86c0866cc2 4.4.0-138-generic #164~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 
5 08:56:16 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | trunk / 84bb980 |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_191 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| checkstyle | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/23187/artifact/out/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn.txt
 |
|  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/23187/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 677 (vs. ulimit of 10000) |
| modules | C: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-api 
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-common 
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-tests 
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-client U: 
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/23187/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> RM Queue's pending container number might get decreased unexpectedly or even 
> become negative once RM failover
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-9195
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9195
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: client
>    Affects Versions: 3.1.0
>            Reporter: Shengyang Sha
>            Assignee: Shengyang Sha
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: YARN-9195.001.patch, YARN-9195.002.patch, 
> cases_to_recreate_negative_pending_requests_scenario.diff
>
>
> Hi, all:
> Previously we have encountered a serious problem in ResourceManager, we found 
> that pending container number of one RM queue became negative after RM failed 
> over. Since queues in RM are managed in hierarchical structure, the root 
> queue's pending containers became negative at last, thus the scheduling 
> process of the whole cluster became affected.
> The version of both our RM server and AMRM client in our application are 
> based on yarn 3.1, and we uses AMRMClientAsync#addSchedulingRequests() method 
> in our application to request resources from RM.
> After investigation, we found that the direct cause was numAllocations of 
> some AMs' requests became negative after RM failed over. And there are at 
> lease three necessary conditions:
> (1) Use schedulingRequests in AMRM client, and the application set zero to 
> the numAllocations for a schedulingRequest. In our batch job scenario, the 
> numAllocations of a schedulingRequest could turn to zero because 
> theoretically we can run a full batch job using only one container.
> (2) RM failovers.
> (3) Before AM reregisters itself to RM after RM restarts, RM has already 
> recovered some of the application's containers assigned before.
> Here are some more details about the implementation:
> (1) After RM recovers, RM will send all alive containers to AM once it 
> re-register itself through 
> RegisterApplicationMasterResponse#getContainersFromPreviousAttempts.
> (2) During registerApplicationMaster, AMRMClientImpl will 
> removeFromOutstandingSchedulingRequests once AM gets 
> ContainersFromPreviousAttempts without checking whether these containers have 
> been assigned before. As a consequence, its outstanding requests might be 
> decreased unexpectedly even if it may not become negative.
> (3) There is no sanity check in RM to validate requests from AMs.
> For better illustrating this case, I've written a test case based on the 
> latest hadoop trunk, posted in the attachment. You may try case 
> testAMRMClientWithNegativePendingRequestsOnRMRestart and 
> testAMRMClientOnUnexpectedlyDecreasedPendingRequestsOnRMRestart .
> To solve this issue, I propose to filter allocated containers before 
> removeFromOutstandingSchedulingRequests in AMRMClientImpl during 
> registerApplicationMaster, and some sanity checks are also needed to prevent 
> things from getting worse.
> More comments and suggestions are welcomed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to