[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13792821#comment-13792821
 ] 

Sandy Ryza commented on YARN-1300:
----------------------------------

This is occurring because of YARN-1228. It used to be that fair-scheduler.xml 
could house either hadoop-style configuration properties (e.g. for 
yarn.scheduler.fair.assignmultiple) or the fair scheduler allocations 
configuration.  We changed it to only allow the latter, but 
./hadoop-tools/hadoop-sls/src/test/resources/fair-scheduler.xml does the 
former.  We'll need to move the properties in it either into a yarn-site.xml or 
into the code.

Updated the title of the JIRA to reflect this.

> SLS tests fail because conf puts yarn properties in fair-scheduler.xml
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-1300
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1300
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ted Yu
>
> I was looking at 
> https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/2165//testReport/org.apache.hadoop.yarn.sls/TestSLSRunner/testSimulatorRunning/
> I am able to reproduce the failure locally.
> I found that FairSchedulerConfiguration.getAllocationFile() doesn't read the 
> yarn.scheduler.fair.allocation.file config entry from fair-scheduler.xml
> This leads to the following:
> {code}
> Caused by: 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.AllocationConfigurationException:
>  Bad fair scheduler config file: top-level element not <allocations>
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.QueueManager.reloadAllocs(QueueManager.java:302)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.QueueManager.initialize(QueueManager.java:108)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FairScheduler.reinitialize(FairScheduler.java:1145)
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to