[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16911903#comment-16911903 ]
Jonathan Hung commented on YARN-9751: ------------------------------------- Thanks [~leftnoteasy] - {quote} - If admin configures ordering-policy only, it should apply to both queue and app.{quote} Behavior from this patch is: configured ordering policy will only apply to queue. For app, it will just use DEFAULT_APP_ORDERING_POLICY. I think it makes sense not to conflate the two (ordering-policy <-> queue, and app-ordering-policy <-> app, each config has no relation to the other). {quote} - If admin configures ordering-policy and app-ordering-policy, queue and app policies could be different.{quote} Yes that's correct. > Separate queue and app ordering policy capacity scheduler configs > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-9751 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9751 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Jonathan Hung > Assignee: Jonathan Hung > Priority: Major > Labels: release-blocker > Attachments: YARN-9751.001.patch > > > Right now it's not possible to specify distinct app and queue ordering > policies since they share the same {{ordering-policy}} suffix. > There's already a TODO in CapacitySchedulerConfiguration for this. This Jira > intends to fix it. > {noformat} > // TODO (wangda): We need to better distinguish app ordering policy and queue > // ordering policy's classname / configuration options, etc. And dedup code > // if possible.{noformat} -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.2#803003) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org