[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16921250#comment-16921250 ]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-8743: --------------------------------- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment || | {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 0s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} | | {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red} 0m 7s{color} | {color:red} YARN-8743 does not apply to trunk. Rebase required? Wrong Branch? See https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute for help. {color} | \\ \\ || Subsystem || Report/Notes || | JIRA Issue | YARN-8743 | | JIRA Patch URL | https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12938417/YARN-8743.002.patch | | Console output | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/24717/console | | Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0 http://yetus.apache.org | This message was automatically generated. > capacity scheduler doesn't set node label to reserved container > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-8743 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8743 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug > Components: capacity scheduler, scheduler preemption > Reporter: Hu Ziqian > Assignee: Hu Ziqian > Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-8743.001.patch, YARN-8743.002.patch > > > capacity scheduler doesn't set node label when new a reserved container's > RMContainerImpl. When allocate this container, leafQueue will treat it as a > ignorePartitionExclusivityRMContainer. > It will cause preempt failure. When preempt happens, the preemption policy > will try to preempt the reserved container while leafQueue doesn't remove it > from ignorePartitionExclusivityRMContainers. In our cluster, we found that > preemption policy will always try to preempt the reserved container and > actually preempt nothing. > We set the node label information to reserved container's RMContainerImpl > and redo our test. The preemption performs as expected. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.2#803003) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org