[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16921250#comment-16921250
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on YARN-8743:
---------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red}  0m  7s{color} 
| {color:red} YARN-8743 does not apply to trunk. Rebase required? Wrong Branch? 
See https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute for help. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Issue | YARN-8743 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12938417/YARN-8743.002.patch |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/24717/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> capacity scheduler doesn't set node label to reserved container
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-8743
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8743
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: capacity scheduler, scheduler preemption
>            Reporter: Hu Ziqian
>            Assignee: Hu Ziqian
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: YARN-8743.001.patch, YARN-8743.002.patch
>
>
> capacity scheduler doesn't set node label when new a reserved container's 
> RMContainerImpl. When allocate this container, leafQueue will treat it as a 
> ignorePartitionExclusivityRMContainer.
> It will cause preempt failure. When preempt happens, the preemption policy 
> will try to preempt the reserved container while leafQueue doesn't remove it 
> from ignorePartitionExclusivityRMContainers. In our cluster, we found that 
> preemption policy will always try to preempt the reserved container and 
> actually preempt nothing.
> We set the node label information to  reserved container's RMContainerImpl 
> and redo our test. The preemption performs as expected.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to