[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16938988#comment-16938988 ]
Peter Bacsko commented on YARN-9841: ------------------------------------ [~maniraj...@gmail.com] no problem, I'm fine with a separate JIRA. I haven't had the chance to examine the mapping behaviour, hopefully tomorrow I'll have some time. I also asked [~Prabhu Joseph] to verify it because he's knowledgeable about CS. > Capacity scheduler: add support for combined %user + %primary_group mapping > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-9841 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9841 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: capacity scheduler > Reporter: Peter Bacsko > Assignee: Manikandan R > Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-9841.001.patch, YARN-9841.001.patch, > YARN-9841.002.patch, YARN-9841.junit.patch > > > Right now in CS, using {{%primary_group}} with a parent queue is only > possible this way: > {{u:%user:parentqueue.%primary_group}} > Looking at > https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/trunk/hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/placement/UserGroupMappingPlacementRule.java, > we cannot do something like: > {{u:%user:%primary_group.%user}} > Fair Scheduler supports a nested rule where such a placement/mapping rule is > possible. This improvement would reduce this feature gap. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org