[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16956688#comment-16956688
]
Peter Bacsko commented on YARN-9887:
------------------------------------
[~wangda] that's correct, but are you saying that we should not spend time on
this and abandon it?
Just asking because I was under the impression that eventually we'll address
all feature gap between FS and CS. This might not be the most important one
(that is indeed YARN-9879), but nevertheless CS doesn't support it. You think
we should abandon implementing of this? Or just lower the priority?
Note that it's not necessarily for Phase 2, it could be done later. What is
your position on this?
> Capacity scheduler: add support for limiting maxRunningApps per user
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-9887
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9887
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: capacity scheduler
> Reporter: Peter Bacsko
> Priority: Major
>
> Fair Scheduler supports limiting the number of applications that a particular
> user can submit:
> {noformat}
> <user name="someuser">
> <maxRunningApps>10</maxRunningApps>
> </user>
> {noformat}
> Capacity Scheduler does not have an exact equivalent.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
