[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13820641#comment-13820641
]
Alejandro Abdelnur commented on YARN-1404:
------------------------------------------
[~hitesh], We actually don't need the constant {{UNMANAGED_CONTAINER}}, we can
just specify NULL and would mean not process associated to the container.
[~bikassaha], I'm following YARN-1040 but it didn't strike me as related,
specially as it cares about >1 processes. But in the way you position it can be
as related.
So, starting a container with a NULL {{ContainerLauncherContext}} would start
the container life and avoid it from being timeout and claimed by the RM.
Then this JIRA could be seen as a subtask of YARN-1040 that enables the zero
process use case to be followed up by the reuse use case. Do you agree?
> Add support for unmanaged containers
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-1404
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1404
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: nodemanager
> Affects Versions: 2.2.0
> Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur
> Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur
> Attachments: YARN-1404.patch
>
>
> Currently a container allocation requires to start a container process with
> the corresponding NodeManager's node.
> For applications that need to use the allocated resources out of band from
> Yarn this means that a dummy container process must be started.
> Impala/Llama is an example of such application which is currently starting a
> 'sleep 10y' (10 years) process as the container process. And the resource
> capabilities are used out of by and the Impala process collocated in the
> node. The Impala process ensures the processing associated to that resources
> do not exceed the capabilities of the container. Also, if the container is
> lost/preempted/killed, Impala stops using the corresponding resources.
> In addition, in the case of Llama, the current requirement of having a
> container process, gets complicates when hard resource enforcement (memory
> -ContainersMonitor- or cpu -via cgroups-) is enabled because Impala/Llama
> request resources with CPU and memory independently of each other. Some
> requests are CPU only and others are memory only. Unmanaged containers solve
> this problem as there is no underlying process with zero CPU or zero memory.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
