[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17224657#comment-17224657
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on YARN-10458:
----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime ||  Logfile || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 29m 
31s{color} |  | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} |  | {color:green} No case conflicting files found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} |  | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. 
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} |  | {color:green} The patch appears to include 3 new or modified 
test files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-3.3 Compile Tests {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 34m 
18s{color} |  | {color:green} branch-3.3 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  0m 
47s{color} |  | {color:green} branch-3.3 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
37s{color} |  | {color:green} branch-3.3 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m 
51s{color} |  | {color:green} branch-3.3 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
16m 53s{color} |  | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and 
testing our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
32s{color} |  | {color:green} branch-3.3 passed {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} spotbugs {color} | {color:blue}  1m 
43s{color} |  | {color:blue} Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering 
switching to SpotBugs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  1m 
41s{color} |  | {color:green} branch-3.3 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} || ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  0m 
48s{color} |  | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  0m 
42s{color} |  | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  0m 
42s{color} |  | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} blanks {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} |  | {color:green} The patch has no blanks issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
32s{color} |  | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m 
45s{color} |  | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
17m 50s{color} |  | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
53s{color} |  | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  2m 
55s{color} |  | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} || ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}102m  0s{color} 
| 
[/patch-unit-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager.txt|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/280/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager.txt]
 | {color:red} hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
37s{color} |  | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}210m 23s{color} | 
 | {color:black}{color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | 
hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.TestRMHATimelineCollectors |
|   | hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.security.TestDelegationTokenRenewer |
|   | 
hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.TestFairSchedulerPreemption |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | ClientAPI=1.40 ServerAPI=1.40 base: 
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/280/artifact/out/Dockerfile
 |
| JIRA Issue | YARN-10458 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13014569/YARN-10458-branch-3.3.001.patch
 |
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite 
unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 8f65a1435b2e 4.15.0-112-generic #113-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jul 9 
23:41:39 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | personality/hadoop.sh |
| git revision | branch-3.3 / cdaef111d51e9493a7cee7c1d4b49485d439e218 |
| Default Java | Private Build-1.8.0_272-8u272-b10-0ubuntu1~16.04-b10 |
|  Test Results | 
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/280/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 839 (vs. ulimit of 5500) |
| modules | C: 
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager
 U: 
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager
 |
| Console output | 
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/280/console |
| versions | git=2.7.4 maven=3.3.9 findbugs=3.1.0-RC1 |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.14.0-SNAPSHOT https://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> Hive On Tez queries fails upon submission to dynamically created pools
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-10458
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10458
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: resourcemanager
>            Reporter: Anand Srinivasan
>            Assignee: Peter Bacsko
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.4.0
>
>         Attachments: YARN-10458-001.patch, YARN-10458-002.patch, 
> YARN-10458-003.patch, YARN-10458-004.patch, YARN-10458-branch-3.3.001.patch
>
>
> While using Dynamic Auto-Creation and Management of Leaf Queues, we could see 
> that the queue creation fails because ACL submit application check couldn't 
> succeed.
> We tried setting acl_submit_applications to '*' for managed parent queues. 
> For static queues, this worked but failed for dynamic queues. Also tried 
> setting the below property but it didn't help either.
> yarn.scheduler.capacity.root.parent-queue-name.leaf-queue-template.acl_submit_applications=*.
> RM error log shows the following :
> 2020-09-18 01:08:40,579 INFO 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.placement.UserGroupMappingPlacementRule:
>  Application application_1600399068816_0460 user user1 mapping [default] to 
> [queue1] override false
> 2020-09-18 01:08:40,579 WARN 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.RMAppManager: User 'user1' from 
> application tag does not have access to  queue 'user1'. The placement is done 
> for user 'hive'
>  
> Checking the code, scheduler#checkAccess() bails out even before checking the 
> ACL permissions for that particular queue because the CSQueue is null.
> {code:java}
> public boolean checkAccess(UserGroupInformation callerUGI,
> QueueACL acl, String queueName) {
> CSQueue queue = getQueue(queueName);
> if (queue == null) {
> if (LOG.isDebugEnabled())
> { LOG.debug("ACL not found for queue access-type " + acl + " for queue " + 
> queueName); }
> return false;                    *<-- the method returns false here.*
> }
> return queue.hasAccess(acl, callerUGI);
> }
> {code}
> As this is an auto created queue, CSQueue may be null in this case. May be 
> scheduler#checkAccess() should have a logic to differentiate when CSQueue is 
> null and if queue mapping is involved and if so, check if the parent queue 
> exists and is a managed parent and if so, check if the parent queue has valid 
> ACL's instead of returning false ?
> Thanks



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to