[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17333560#comment-17333560 ]
Eric Badger commented on YARN-10493: ------------------------------------ bq. In theory we could change that if there is a benefit in your opinion, but my initial reaction is that adding sub-directories to that namespace may make it harder to track images (cleanup, governance, perhaps even quotas, etc.). I don't think it's a huge deal. A nice to have feature, but if it requires a major rework then I don't think it's necessary. The reason I think it would be nice is so that we can more cleanly segment our images. E.g. you could have {{hadoop/small-image/rhel7:7.9}} or something like that. But again, it's not a huge deal if it's difficult > RunC container repository v2 > ---------------------------- > > Key: YARN-10493 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10493 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager, yarn > Affects Versions: 3.3.0 > Reporter: Craig Condit > Assignee: Matthew Sharp > Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Attachments: runc-container-repository-v2-design.pdf, > runc-container-repository-v2-design_updated.pdf > > Time Spent: 1h 20m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > The current runc container repository design has scalability and usability > issues which will likely limit widespread adoption. We should address this > with a new, V2 layout. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org