[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13838514#comment-13838514 ]
Hadoop QA commented on YARN-1307: --------------------------------- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12616926/YARN-1307.9.patch against trunk revision . {color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files. {color:red}-1 javac{color:red}. The patch appears to cause the build to fail. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/2594//console This message is automatically generated. > Rethink znode structure for RM HA > --------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-1307 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1307 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: resourcemanager > Reporter: Tsuyoshi OZAWA > Assignee: Tsuyoshi OZAWA > Attachments: YARN-1307.1.patch, YARN-1307.2.patch, YARN-1307.3.patch, > YARN-1307.4-2.patch, YARN-1307.4-3.patch, YARN-1307.4.patch, > YARN-1307.5.patch, YARN-1307.6.patch, YARN-1307.7.patch, YARN-1307.8.patch, > YARN-1307.9.patch, YARN-1307.9.patch > > > Rethink for znode structure for RM HA is proposed in some JIRAs(YARN-659, > YARN-1222). The motivation of this JIRA is quoted from Bikas' comment in > YARN-1222: > {quote} > We should move to creating a node hierarchy for apps such that all znodes for > an app are stored under an app znode instead of the app root znode. This will > help in removeApplication and also in scaling better on ZK. The earlier code > was written this way to ensure create/delete happens under a root znode for > fencing. But given that we have moved to multi-operations globally, this isnt > required anymore. > {quote} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)