[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17755773#comment-17755773
]
Jiandan Yang commented on YARN-5357:
-------------------------------------
Hello, [~abmodi] [~vrushalic]
I've noticed that this JIRA hasn't seen any updates in over four years. I'm
interested in continuing the development on this issue. I was wondering if you
are still following or working on this topic?
I'd like to build upon the discussions that have taken place here. If anyone
involved in the previous discussions could provide or point me to the proposed
solutions or strategies discussed earlier, that would be immensely helpful.
Looking forward to your insights and feedback as I venture into progressing
this issue further.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
> Timeline service v2 integration with Federation
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-5357
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5357
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: timelineserver
> Reporter: Vrushali C
> Assignee: Abhishek Modi
> Priority: Major
>
> Jira to note the discussion points from an initial chat about integrating
> Timeline Service v2 with Federation (YARN-2915).
> cc [~subru] [~curino]
> For Federation:
> - all entities that belong to the same flow run should have the same cluster
> name
> - app id in the same flow run strongly ordered in time
> - need a logical cluster name and physical cluster name
> - a possibility to implement the Application TimelineCollector as an
> interceptor in the AMRMProxyService.
> For Timeline Service:
> - need to store physical cluster id and logical cluster id so that we don't
> lose information at any level (flow/app/entity etc)
> - add a new table app id to cluster mapping table
> - need a different entity table/some table to store node level metrics for
> physical cluster stats. Once we get to node-level rollup, we probably have to
> store something in a dc, cluster, rack, node hierarchy. In that case a
> physical cluster makes sense, but we'd still need some way to tie physical
> and logical together in order to make automatic error detection etc that
> we're envisioning feasible within a federated setup.
> For the Cluster Naming convention:
> - three situations for cluster name:
> ----> app submitted to router should take federated (aka logical) cluster name
> ----> app submitted directly to RM should take physical cluster name
> ----> Info about the physical cluster in entities?
> - suggestion to set the cluster name as yarn tag at the router level (in the
> app submission context)
> Other points to note:
> - for federation to work smoothly in environments that use HDFS some
> additional considerations are needed, and possibly some solution like what is
> being used at Twitter with the nFly approach.
> Email thread context:
> {code}
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Joep Rottinghuis
> Date: Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 1:22 PM
> Subject: Re: Federation -Timeline Service meeting notes
> To: Subramaniam Venkatraman Krishnan
> Cc: Sangjin Lee, Vrushali Channapattan , Carlo Curino
> Thanks for the notes.
> I think that for federation to work smoothly in environments that use HDFS
> some additional considerations are needed, and possibly some solution like
> what we're using at Twitter with our nFly approach.
> bq. - need a different entity table/some table to store node level metrics
> for physical cluster stats
> Once we get to node-level rollup, we probably have to store something in a
> dc, cluster, rack, node hierarchy. In that case a physical cluster makes
> sense, but we'd still need some way to tie physical and logical together in
> order to make automatic error detection etc that we're envisioning feasible
> within a federated setup.
> Cheers,
> Joep
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Subramaniam Venkatraman Krishnan wrote:
> Thanks Vrushali for crisply capturing the essential from our rambling
> discussion J.
>
> Sangjin, I just want to add one comment to yours – we want to retain the
> physical cluster name (possibly as a new entity type) so that we don’t lose
> information & we can cluster level rollups even if they are not efficient.
>
> Additionally, based on the walkthrough of Federation design:
> · There was general agreement with the proposed approach.
> · There is a possibility to implement the Application
> TimelineCollector as an interceptor in the AMRMProxyService.
> · Joep raised the concern that it would be better if the RMs
> obtain the epoch from FederationStateStore. This is not currently in the
> roadmap of our MVP but we definitely plan to address this in future.
>
> Regards,
> Subru
>
> From: Sangjin Lee
> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 6:22 PM
> To: Vrushali Channapattan
> Cc: Joep Rottinghuis; Carlo Curino; Subramaniam Venkatraman Krishnan
> Subject: Re: Federation -Timeline Service meeting notes
>
> Thanks for the summary Vrushali!
>
> Just so that we're on the same page regarding the terminology, I
> understand we're using the terms "logical cluster" and "federated cluster"
> interchangeably.
>
> Also, between using the federated cluster name and the home cluster name
> as a solution, I think we were leaning towards the federated cluster name
> (although not concluded).
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Vrushali Channapattan wrote:
>
> For Federation:
> - all entities that belong to the same flow run should have the same
> cluster name
> - app id in the same flow run strongly ordered in time
> - need a logical cluster name and physical cluster name
> For Timeline Service:
> - need to store physical cluster id and logical cluster id so that we
> don't lose information at any level (flow/app/entity etc)
> - add a new table app id to cluster mapping table
> - need a different entity table/some table to store node level
> metrics for physical cluster stats
> For the Cluster Naming convention:
> - three situations for cluster name:
> ----> app submitted to router should take federated cluster name
> ----> app submitted directly to RM should take physical cluster name
> ----> Info about the physical cluster in entities?
> - suggestion to set the cluster name as yarn tag at the router level
> (in the app submission context)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
