[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13856757#comment-13856757
 ] 

Bikas Saha commented on YARN-1506:
----------------------------------

Per operation vs configuration makes sense. I would just like to avoid this 
reconfiguration from spreading to parts of the code where it does not need to.

> Replace set resource change on RMNode/SchedulerNode directly with event 
> notification.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-1506
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1506
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: nodemanager, scheduler
>            Reporter: Junping Du
>            Assignee: Junping Du
>            Priority: Blocker
>
> According to Vinod's comments on YARN-312 
> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-312?focusedCommentId=13846087&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13846087),
>  we should replace RMNode.setResourceOption() with some resource change event.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to