[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-11736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17890324#comment-17890324
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on YARN-11736:
---------------------------------------

TaoYang526 opened a new pull request, #7121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/7121

   ### Description of PR
   
   Please refer to JIRA: YARN-11736
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   UT
   
   ### For code changes:
   
   - [x] Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id 
(e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
   - [ ] Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the 
endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
   - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)?
   - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `LICENSE`, `LICENSE-binary`, 
`NOTICE-binary` files?
   
   




> Enhance MultiNodeLookupPolicy to allow configuration of extended comparators 
> for better usability.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-11736
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-11736
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: multi-node-placement
>            Reporter: Tao Yang
>            Assignee: Tao Yang
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently when multi-nodes is enabled, there is only 1 implementation of 
> _MultiNodeLookupPolicy_ interface: {_}ResourceUsageMultiNodeLookupPolicy{_}, 
> which will sort nodes by allocated resources in ascending order. 
> If cluster has nodes with different resource-spec, the resource utilization 
> of smaller nodes will be significantly high, while larger nodes will 
> experience low resource utilization. This may rise the hotspot risk and 
> reduce the scheduling effectiveness.
> So I propose to add a new policy called _EnhancedMultiNodeLookupPolicy_ to 
> meet requirements from some complex scenarios, which should contains serveral 
> inherit comparators and can be extended later, and supports configuring 
> specified comparators for different policy instances.
>  
> {*}Implementation Details{*}:
> 1. _MultiNodeSorter#initPolicy_ will pass the policyConf which is cloned from 
> scheduler configuration and attached the name of current policy, so that we 
> can fetch the specified configuration for this policy inside the 
> implementations of MultiNodeLookupPolicy.
> 2. new implementation of {_}MultiNodeLookupPolicy{_}: 
> _EnhancedMultiNodeLookupPolicy_
>    2.1) contains several inherit comparators and can be extendable later. 
> comparator keys: _ALLOCATED_RESOURCE / UNALLOCATED_RESOURCE / 
> DOMINANT_RESOURCE_RATIO / NODE_ID,_  order-directions: _ASC / DESC._
>    2.2) supports configuring specified comparators with 
> order-direction(ASC/DESC) for different policy instances via conf-key: 
> {+}{color:#172b4d}yarn.scheduler.capacity.multi-node-sorting.policy.<policy-name>.comparators{color}{+},
>  value format is 
> "<comparator_key_1>[:<order_direction_1>],<comparator_key_2>[:<order_direction_2>],...".
>   For example, "DOMINANT_ALLOCATED_RATIO,NODE_ID:DESC" means that for policy 
> test, nodes should be sorted by dominant-resource-ratio in ascending order, 
> by nodeID desc in descending order.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to