[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18046469#comment-18046469
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on YARN-9834:
--------------------------------------
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #1446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/1446#issuecomment-3672853719
We're closing this stale PR because it has been open for 100 days with no
activity. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a
way of keeping the PR queue manageable.
If you feel like this was a mistake, or you would like to continue working
on it, please feel free to re-open it and ask for a committer to remove the
stale tag and review again.
Thanks all for your contribution.
> Allow using a pool of local users to run Yarn Secure Container in secure mode
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-9834
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9834
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: nodemanager
> Affects Versions: 3.1.2
> Reporter: shanyu zhao
> Assignee: shanyu zhao
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Attachments: YarnSecureContainerWithPoolOfLocalUsers.pdf
>
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Yarn Secure Container allows separation of different user's local files and
> container processes running on the same node manager. This depends on an out
> of band service such as SSSD/Winbind to sync all domain users to local
> machine that runs Yarn node manager. *Hadoop code only works with local
> users*.
> Winbind/SSSD user sync has lots of overhead, especially for large
> corporations. Also if running Yarn node manager inside Kubernetes cluster
> (meaning node managers running inside Docker container), it doesn't make
> sense for each Docker container to domain join with Active Directory and sync
> a whole copy of domain users to the Docker container.
> We need an optional light-weighted approach to enable Yarn Secure Container
> in secure mode, as an alternative to AD domain join and SSSD/Winbind based
> user-sync service.
> Today, class LinuxContainerExecutor already supports running Yarn container
> process as one designated local user in non-secure mode.
> *We can add new configurations to Yarn, such that with LinuxContainerExecutor
> we can pre-create a pool of local users on each Yarn node manager. At
> runtime, Yarn node manager allocates a local user to run the container
> process, for the domain user that submits the application*. When all
> containers of that user are finished and all files belonging to that user are
> deleted, we can release the allocation and allow other users to use the same
> local user to run their Yarn containers.
> Please look at attached design doc for more details.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
