[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13917826#comment-13917826
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on YARN-1389:
---------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12632192/YARN-1389-2.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:red}-1 javac{color:red}.  The patch appears to cause the build to 
fail.

Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/3228//console

This message is automatically generated.

> ApplicationClientProtocol and ApplicationHistoryProtocol should expose analog 
> APIs
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-1389
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1389
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Mayank Bansal
>            Assignee: Mayank Bansal
>         Attachments: YARN-1389-1.patch, YARN-1389-2.patch
>
>
> As we plan to have the APIs in ApplicationHistoryProtocol to expose the 
> reports of *finished* application attempts and containers, we should do the 
> same for ApplicationClientProtocol, which will return the reports of 
> *running* attempts and containers.
> Later on, we can improve YarnClient to direct the query of running instance 
> to ApplicationClientProtocol, while that of finished instance to 
> ApplicationHistoryProtocol, making it transparent to the users.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to