[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13919580#comment-13919580
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on YARN-1670:
---------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12632525/YARN-1670.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  There were no new javadoc warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}.  The patch built with 
eclipse:eclipse.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in 
hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-common.

    {color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/3243//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/3243//console

This message is automatically generated.

> aggregated log writer can write more log data then it says is the log length
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-1670
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1670
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 0.23.10, 2.2.0
>            Reporter: Thomas Graves
>            Assignee: Mit Desai
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: YARN-1670-b23.patch, YARN-1670.patch, YARN-1670.patch
>
>
> We have seen exceptions when using 'yarn logs' to read log files. 
> at 
> java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:65)
>        at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:441)
>        at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:483)
>        at 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.logaggregation.AggregatedLogFormat$LogReader.readAContainerLogsForALogType(AggregatedLogFormat.java:518)
>        at 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.logaggregation.LogDumper.dumpAContainerLogs(LogDumper.java:178)
>        at 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.logaggregation.LogDumper.run(LogDumper.java:130)
>        at 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.logaggregation.LogDumper.main(LogDumper.java:246)
> We traced it down to the reader trying to read the file type of the next file 
> but where it reads is still log data from the previous file.  What happened 
> was the Log Length was written as a certain size but the log data was 
> actually longer then that.  
> Inside of the write() routine in LogValue it first writes what the logfile 
> length is, but then when it goes to write the log itself it just goes to the 
> end of the file.  There is a race condition here where if someone is still 
> writing to the file when it goes to be aggregated the length written could be 
> to small.
> We should have the write() routine stop when it writes whatever it said was 
> the length.  It would be nice if we could somehow tell the user it might be 
> truncated but I'm not sure of a good way to do this.
> We also noticed that a bug in readAContainerLogsForALogType where it is using 
> an int for curRead whereas it should be using a long. 
>       while (len != -1 && curRead < fileLength) {
> This isn't actually a problem right now as it looks like the underlying 
> decoder is doing the right thing and the len condition exits.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to