[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jian He updated YARN-2001:
--------------------------

    Description: 
After failover, RM may require a certain threshold to determine whether it’s 
safe to make scheduling decisions and start accepting new container requests 
from AMs. The threshold could be a certain amount of nodes. i.e. RM waits until 
a certain amount of nodes joining before accepting new container requests.  Or 
it could simply be a timeout, only after the timeout RM accepts new requests. 
NMs joined after the threshold can be treated as new NMs and instructed to kill 
all its containers.

  was:After failover, RM may require a certain threshold to determine whether 
it’s safe to make scheduling decisions and start accepting new container 
requests from AMs. The threshold could be a certain amount of nodes. i.e. RM 
waits until a certain amount of nodes joining before accepting new container 
requests.  Or it could simply be a timeout, only after the timeout RM accepts 
new requests.


> Threshold for RM to accept requests from AM after failover
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-2001
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2001
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: resourcemanager
>            Reporter: Jian He
>            Assignee: Jian He
>
> After failover, RM may require a certain threshold to determine whether it’s 
> safe to make scheduling decisions and start accepting new container requests 
> from AMs. The threshold could be a certain amount of nodes. i.e. RM waits 
> until a certain amount of nodes joining before accepting new container 
> requests.  Or it could simply be a timeout, only after the timeout RM accepts 
> new requests. 
> NMs joined after the threshold can be treated as new NMs and instructed to 
> kill all its containers.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to