[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14143460#comment-14143460
]
Allen Wittenauer commented on YARN-913:
---------------------------------------
bq. Summary: need to fix ZK client and then have curator configure it, so the
rest of us don't have to care.
This might be a blocker then. If a client needs to talk to more than one ZK,
it sounds like they are basically screwed.
bq. do you mean in the endpoint fields? It should ... let me clarify that in
the example.
I was mainly looking at the hostname pattern:
{code}
+ String HOSTNAME_PATTERN =
+ "([a-z0-9]|[a-z0-9][a-z0-9\\-]*[a-z0-9])";
{code}
It doesn't appear to support periods/dots.
> Add a way to register long-lived services in a YARN cluster
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-913
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-913
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: api, resourcemanager
> Affects Versions: 2.5.0, 2.4.1
> Reporter: Steve Loughran
> Assignee: Steve Loughran
> Attachments: 2014-09-03_Proposed_YARN_Service_Registry.pdf,
> 2014-09-08_YARN_Service_Registry.pdf, RegistrationServiceDetails.txt,
> YARN-913-001.patch, YARN-913-002.patch, YARN-913-003.patch,
> YARN-913-003.patch, YARN-913-004.patch, YARN-913-006.patch,
> YARN-913-007.patch, YARN-913-008.patch, yarnregistry.pdf, yarnregistry.tla
>
>
> In a YARN cluster you can't predict where services will come up -or on what
> ports. The services need to work those things out as they come up and then
> publish them somewhere.
> Applications need to be able to find the service instance they are to bond to
> -and not any others in the cluster.
> Some kind of service registry -in the RM, in ZK, could do this. If the RM
> held the write access to the ZK nodes, it would be more secure than having
> apps register with ZK themselves.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
