[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14152523#comment-14152523
 ] 

Craig Welch commented on YARN-2198:
-----------------------------------

pom.xml - don’t see a /etc/hadoop or a wsce-site.xml, missed?

RawLocalFileSystem

Is someone from HDFS looking at this?

protected boolean mkOneDir(File p2f) throws IOException - nit, generalize arg 
name pls

return (parent == null || parent2f.exists() || mkdirs(parent)) &&
+      (mkOneDir(p2f) || p2f.isDirectory());

so, I don't get this logic, & believe it will fail if the path exists and is 
not a directory.  Why not just do if p2f doesn't exist mkdirs(p2f)? seems much 
simpler, and drops the need for mkOneDir

NativeIO

Elevated class - I believe this is Windows specific, "WindowsElevated" or 
"ElevatedWindows"?  Why doesn't it extend "Windows" - I don't think secure and 
insecure windows should become "wholly dissimilar"

createTaskAsUser, killTask, ProcessStub:

These aren't really "io", I think they should be factored out to their own 
process-specific class


> Remove the need to run NodeManager as privileged account for Windows Secure 
> Container Executor
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-2198
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2198
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Remus Rusanu
>            Assignee: Remus Rusanu
>              Labels: security, windows
>         Attachments: .YARN-2198.delta.10.patch, YARN-2198.1.patch, 
> YARN-2198.2.patch, YARN-2198.3.patch, YARN-2198.delta.4.patch, 
> YARN-2198.delta.5.patch, YARN-2198.delta.6.patch, YARN-2198.delta.7.patch, 
> YARN-2198.separation.patch, YARN-2198.trunk.10.patch, 
> YARN-2198.trunk.4.patch, YARN-2198.trunk.5.patch, YARN-2198.trunk.6.patch, 
> YARN-2198.trunk.8.patch, YARN-2198.trunk.9.patch
>
>
> YARN-1972 introduces a Secure Windows Container Executor. However this 
> executor requires the process launching the container to be LocalSystem or a 
> member of the a local Administrators group. Since the process in question is 
> the NodeManager, the requirement translates to the entire NM to run as a 
> privileged account, a very large surface area to review and protect.
> This proposal is to move the privileged operations into a dedicated NT 
> service. The NM can run as a low privilege account and communicate with the 
> privileged NT service when it needs to launch a container. This would reduce 
> the surface exposed to the high privileges. 
> There has to exist a secure, authenticated and authorized channel of 
> communication between the NM and the privileged NT service. Possible 
> alternatives are a new TCP endpoint, Java RPC etc. My proposal though would 
> be to use Windows LPC (Local Procedure Calls), which is a Windows platform 
> specific inter-process communication channel that satisfies all requirements 
> and is easy to deploy. The privileged NT service would register and listen on 
> an LPC port (NtCreatePort, NtListenPort). The NM would use JNI to interop 
> with libwinutils which would host the LPC client code. The client would 
> connect to the LPC port (NtConnectPort) and send a message requesting a 
> container launch (NtRequestWaitReplyPort). LPC provides authentication and 
> the privileged NT service can use authorization API (AuthZ) to validate the 
> caller.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to