[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14187987#comment-14187987
 ] 

Zhijie Shen commented on YARN-2765:
-----------------------------------

[~jlowe], the leveldb should be a good choice over local file system in terms 
of the merits mentioned in the description. One drawback I can think of is that 
while LeveldbRMStateStore is lightweight for single RM restarting, multiple RMs 
of HA are not able to share this single-host database. Correct me if I'm wrong.

BTW, I saw you also have other Jira for JHS using leveldb. Did you have a 
chance to think of an enhanced k/v db: rocksdb? I guess it will benefit the RM 
case as well as the timeline case.

> Add leveldb-based implementation for RMStateStore
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-2765
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2765
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: resourcemanager
>            Reporter: Jason Lowe
>            Assignee: Jason Lowe
>         Attachments: YARN-2765.patch
>
>
> It would be nice to have a leveldb option to the resourcemanager recovery 
> store. Leveldb would provide some benefits over the existing filesystem store 
> such as better support for atomic operations, fewer I/O ops per state update, 
> and far fewer total files on the filesystem.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to