[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14248633#comment-14248633
]
Jian He commented on YARN-2964:
-------------------------------
bq. the difference between shouldCancelAtEnd is ignored and therefore lost
when the first job's token is already in the set.
One question, who is setting the shouldCancelAtEnd flag? is it only the main
job or all sub-jobs are setting it?
> RM prematurely cancels tokens for jobs that submit jobs (oozie)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-2964
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2964
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: resourcemanager
> Affects Versions: 2.6.0
> Reporter: Daryn Sharp
> Priority: Blocker
>
> The RM used to globally track the unique set of tokens for all apps. It
> remembered the first job that was submitted with the token. The first job
> controlled the cancellation of the token. This prevented completion of
> sub-jobs from canceling tokens used by the main job.
> As of YARN-2704, the RM now tracks tokens on a per-app basis. There is no
> notion of the first/main job. This results in sub-jobs canceling tokens and
> failing the main job and other sub-jobs. It also appears to schedule
> multiple redundant renewals.
> The issue is not immediately obvious because the RM will cancel tokens ~10
> min (NM livelyness interval) after log aggregation completes. The result is
> an oozie job, ex. pig, that will launch many sub-jobs over time will fail if
> any sub-jobs are launched >10 min after any sub-job completes. If all other
> sub-jobs complete within that 10 min window, then the issue goes unnoticed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
