[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14520196#comment-14520196
 ] 

Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli commented on YARN-2868:
-----------------------------------------------

Going through old tickets. I have two questions
 # Why was this done in a scheduler specific way? RMAppAttempt clearly knows 
when it requests and when it gets the allocation.
 # Seems like the patch only looks at the first AM container. What happens if 
the we have a 2nd AM container?

I accidentally closed this ticket, so doesn't look like I can reopen it. If 
folks agree, I will open a new ticket.

> FairScheduler: Metric for latency to allocate first container for an 
> application
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-2868
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2868
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ray Chiang
>            Assignee: Ray Chiang
>              Labels: metrics, supportability
>             Fix For: 2.8.0
>
>         Attachments: YARN-2868-01.patch, YARN-2868.002.patch, 
> YARN-2868.003.patch, YARN-2868.004.patch, YARN-2868.005.patch, 
> YARN-2868.006.patch, YARN-2868.007.patch, YARN-2868.008.patch, 
> YARN-2868.009.patch, YARN-2868.010.patch, YARN-2868.011.patch, 
> YARN-2868.012.patch
>
>
> Add a metric to measure the latency between "starting container allocation" 
> and "first container actually allocated".



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to