[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14544404#comment-14544404
 ] 

Eric Payne commented on YARN-2069:
----------------------------------

Hi [~mayank_bansal]. Thanks for working through the details related to this 
issue. I have one small nit.

In {{LeafQueue#computeTargetedUserLimit}}, it does not look like the {{MIN}} 
and {{MAX}} variables are ever used.

> CS queue level preemption should respect user-limits
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-2069
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2069
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: capacityscheduler
>            Reporter: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>            Assignee: Mayank Bansal
>              Labels: BB2015-05-TBR
>         Attachments: YARN-2069-trunk-1.patch, YARN-2069-trunk-10.patch, 
> YARN-2069-trunk-2.patch, YARN-2069-trunk-3.patch, YARN-2069-trunk-4.patch, 
> YARN-2069-trunk-5.patch, YARN-2069-trunk-6.patch, YARN-2069-trunk-7.patch, 
> YARN-2069-trunk-8.patch, YARN-2069-trunk-9.patch
>
>
> This is different from (even if related to, and likely share code with) 
> YARN-2113.
> YARN-2113 focuses on making sure that even if queue has its guaranteed 
> capacity, it's individual users are treated in-line with their limits 
> irrespective of when they join in.
> This JIRA is about respecting user-limits while preempting containers to 
> balance queue capacities.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to