[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14570275#comment-14570275
 ] 

Jeff Zhang commented on YARN-3755:
----------------------------------

bq. How about we let individual frameworks like MapReduce/Tez log them as 
needed? That seems like the right place for debugging too - app developers 
don't always get access to the daemon logs.
Make sense. 

> Log the command of launching containers
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-3755
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3755
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.0
>            Reporter: Jeff Zhang
>            Assignee: Jeff Zhang
>         Attachments: YARN-3755-1.patch, YARN-3755-2.patch
>
>
> In the resource manager log, yarn would log the command for launching AM, 
> this is very useful. But there's no such log in the NN log for launching 
> containers. It would be difficult to diagnose when containers fails to launch 
> due to some issue in the commands. Although user can look at the commands in 
> the container launch script file, this is an internal things of yarn, usually 
> user don't know that. In user's perspective, they only know what commands 
> they specify when building yarn application. 
> {code}
> 2015-06-01 16:06:42,245 INFO 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.amlauncher.AMLauncher: Command 
> to launch container container_1433145984561_0001_01_000001 : 
> $JAVA_HOME/bin/java -server -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true 
> -Dhadoop.metrics.log.level=WARN  -Xmx1024m  
> -Dlog4j.configuratorClass=org.apache.tez.common.TezLog4jConfigurator 
> -Dlog4j.configuration=tez-container-log4j.properties 
> -Dyarn.app.container.log.dir=<LOG_DIR> -Dtez.root.logger=info,CLA 
> -Dsun.nio.ch.bugLevel='' org.apache.tez.dag.app.DAGAppMaster 
> 1><LOG_DIR>/stdout 2><LOG_DIR>/stderr
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to