[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14621416#comment-14621416
 ] 

Konstantinos Karanasos commented on YARN-3116:
----------------------------------------------

Thanks for the feedback, [~giovanni.fumarola] and [~zjshen].
I agree that the two JIRAs are complementary.

One first observation is that probably we should have two different flavours of 
container types: ContainerRequestType and ContainerType. The former should be 
exposed to the application (e.g., centralized or distributed scheduling), while 
the latter should encode information for the NM to properly handle the 
container request without exposing it to the application (e.g., GUARANTEED or 
QUEUEABLE, AM_CONTAINER or "non-AM"_CONTAINER). This looks like a more 
future-proof design.

That said, I am wondering whether the ContainerTokenIdentifier is the proper 
place to set the container type to accommodate other types of containers (and 
not just the isAMContainer flag). I am on the go today without access to the 
code -- will get back to you tomorrow regarding that.

> [Collector wireup] We need an assured way to determine if a container is an 
> AM container on NM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-3116
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3116
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: nodemanager, timelineserver
>            Reporter: Zhijie Shen
>            Assignee: Giovanni Matteo Fumarola
>         Attachments: YARN-3116.patch, YARN-3116.v2.patch, YARN-3116.v3.patch, 
> YARN-3116.v4.patch, YARN-3116.v5.patch, YARN-3116.v6.patch, 
> YARN-3116.v7.patch, YARN-3116.v8.patch
>
>
> In YARN-3030, to start the per-app aggregator only for a started AM 
> container,  we need to determine if the container is an AM container or not 
> from the context in NM (we can do it on RM). This information is missing, 
> such that we worked around to considered the container with ID "xxxx_01" as 
> the AM container. Unfortunately, this is neither necessary or sufficient 
> condition. We need to have a way to determine if a container is an AM 
> container on NM. We can add flag to the container object or create an API to 
> do the judgement. Perhaps the distributed AM information may also be useful 
> to YARN-2877.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to