[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15014661#comment-15014661
 ] 

Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli commented on YARN-3623:
-----------------------------------------------

Copying comments from YARN-4183 w.r.t versioning:

By Me
 - There should be an explicit yarn.timeline-service.version which tells 
YarnClient to get tokens or not - yes for non-present version (default), v1, v2 
but no for v1.5.
 - We should also use the same property in the new API calls proposed for V1.5 
YARN-4233 / V2 YARN-2928, lest the users think they can call any API 
independent of what is supported on server side.
 - The version field has semantics on both client and server side at the same 
time - it's picking a solution end-to-end.

By [~sjlee0]
 - The version is a list or enum - 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4183?focusedCommentId=15004954&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15004954.
 Related JIRA: YARN-4368.

> We should have a config to indicate the Timeline Service version
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-3623
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3623
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: timelineserver
>            Reporter: Zhijie Shen
>            Assignee: Naganarasimha G R
>
> So far RM, MR AM, DA AM added/changed new config to enable the feature to 
> write the timeline data to v2 server. It's good to have a YARN 
> timeline-service.version config like timeline-service.enable to indicate the 
> version of the running timeline service with the given YARN cluster. It's 
> beneficial for users to more smoothly move from v1 to v2, as they don't need 
> to change the existing config, but switch this config from v1 to v2. And each 
> framework doesn't need to have their own v1/v2 config.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to