[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15042363#comment-15042363 ]
Kuhu Shukla commented on YARN-4413: ----------------------------------- I agree. However, from the discussions with Junping and Sunil on YARN-4386, bq. I think Recommission event shouldn't be applied on decommissioned nodes as it won't have any affect and we'd better to keep consistent with previous behavior before graceful decommission comes out. Asking [~djp] for further comments. Thanks a lot. > Nodes in the includes list should not be listed as decommissioned in the UI > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-4413 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4413 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: resourcemanager > Affects Versions: 2.7.1 > Reporter: Daniel Templeton > Assignee: Daniel Templeton > Attachments: YARN-4413.001.patch > > > If I decommission a node and then move it from the excludes list back to the > includes list, but I don't restart the node, the node will still be listed by > the web UI as decomissioned until either the NM or RM is restarted. Ideally, > removing the node from the excludes list and putting it back into the > includes list should cause the node to be reported as shutdown instead. > CC [~kshukla] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)