[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15170065#comment-15170065
]
Sangjin Lee commented on YARN-4700:
-----------------------------------
Wait, I think we're using the day timestamp for a reason as this table is
supposed to be a flow (daily) activity table. And some considerations are given
to long running apps that will cross the day boundaries. I'd like us to stick
with that unless there is a compelling reason not to?
In the code that writes to the flow activity table, can we check the
application status and make a decision not to write them?
cc [~jrottinghuis]
> ATS storage has one extra record each time the RM got restarted
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-4700
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4700
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: timelineserver
> Affects Versions: YARN-2928
> Reporter: Li Lu
> Assignee: Naganarasimha G R
> Labels: yarn-2928-1st-milestone
>
> When testing the new web UI for ATS v2, I noticed that we're creating one
> extra record for each finished application (but still hold in the RM state
> store) each time the RM got restarted. It's quite possible that we add the
> cluster start timestamp into the default cluster id, thus each time we're
> creating a new record for one application (cluster id is a part of the row
> key). We need to fix this behavior, probably by having a better default
> cluster id.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
