[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15263066#comment-15263066
 ] 

Wangda Tan commented on YARN-4844:
----------------------------------

[~hitesh], [~vinodkv], I'm convinced. :)

Updated title/desc of this JIRA. Will updates methods of Resource in YARN-5012, 
which should be done with first 3.x release.

> Add getMemoryLong/getVirtualCoreLong to o.a.h.y.api.records.Resource
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-4844
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4844
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: api
>            Reporter: Wangda Tan
>            Assignee: Wangda Tan
>            Priority: Blocker
>         Attachments: YARN-4844.1.patch, YARN-4844.2.patch, YARN-4844.3.patch
>
>
> We use int32 for memory now, if a cluster has 10k nodes, each node has 210G 
> memory, we will get a negative total cluster memory.
> And another case that easier overflows int32 is: we added all pending 
> resources of running apps to cluster's total pending resources. If a 
> problematic app requires too much resources (let's say 1M+ containers, each 
> of them has 3G containers), int32 will be not enough.
> Even if we can cap each app's pending request, we cannot handle the case that 
> there're many running apps, each of them has capped but still significant 
> numbers of pending resources.
> So we may possibly need to add getMemoryLong/getVirtualCoreLong to 
> o.a.h.y.api.records.Resource.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to