[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15289046#comment-15289046
]
Junping Du commented on YARN-5076:
----------------------------------
Granular control on different XFS options sounds reasonable. However, back to
my original question - do we need to partially enable XFS protection? If not,
at least we can merge all "xframe-options-enabled" configurations. I want to
call loudly for our attention on adding new configuration carefully: once
unnecessary configurations are added, it would be very hard to remove.
In addition, mark XFS protection enabled with DENY option by default is a kind
of behavior change - that could affect monitoring tools like Ambari. Shall we
disable it by default?
> YARN web interfaces lack XFS protection
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-5076
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5076
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager, timelineserver
> Reporter: Jonathan Maron
> Assignee: Jonathan Maron
> Attachments: YARN-5076.002.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 48h
> Remaining Estimate: 48h
>
> There are web interfaces in YARN that do not provide protection against cross
> frame scripting
> (https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Clickjacking_Defense_Cheat_Sheet).
> HADOOP-13008 provides a common filter for addressing this vulnerability, so
> this filter should be integrated into the YARN web interfaces.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
