[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15381000#comment-15381000
]
Arun Suresh commented on YARN-4888:
-----------------------------------
Ping [~leftnoteasy], [~jianhe], [~kasha]...
Wondering if we can get a review to validate the approach for before we attempt
to fix all the checkstyle and javadoc warning
As [~subru] mentioned
[here|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4888?focusedCommentId=15380355&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15380355],
Please do not be put off by the size of the patch :), Almost all the
modifications are a result of directly replacing {{Priority}} with the
{{SchedulerKey}} and are very straightforward.
> Changes in RM AppSchedulingInfo for identifying resource-requests explicitly
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-4888
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4888
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: resourcemanager
> Reporter: Subru Krishnan
> Assignee: Subru Krishnan
> Attachments: YARN-4888-WIP.patch, YARN-4888-v0.patch,
> YARN-4888.001.patch
>
>
> YARN-4879 puts forward the notion of identifying allocate requests
> explicitly. This JIRA is to track the changes in RM app scheduling data
> structures to accomplish it. Please refer to the design doc in the parent
> JIRA for details.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
