[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15384516#comment-15384516 ]
Nikhil Mulley commented on YARN-5401: ------------------------------------- So, should apps always use app specific methods to kill their jobs but never use yarn kill unless really necessary. (like always use kill(TERM) unless kill -9 becomes necessary) > yarn application kill does not let mapreduce jobs show up in jobhistory > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-5401 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5401 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug > Components: yarn > Environment: centos 6.6 > apache hadoop 2.6.4 > Reporter: Nikhil Mulley > > Hi, > Its been found in our cluster running apache hadoop 2.6.4, that while the > mapreduce jobs that are killed with 'hadoop job -kill' command do end up have > the job and its counters to jobhistory server but when 'yarn application > -kill' is used on mapreduce application, job does not show up in jobhistory > server interface. > Is this intentional? If so, any particular reasons? > It would be better to have mapreduce application history reported on > jobhistory irrespective of whether kill is performed using yarn application > cli or hadoop job cli. > thanks, > Nikhil -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org