[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15490385#comment-15490385
]
Ajith S commented on YARN-5547:
-------------------------------
So we have two approaches discussed here
1. Either skip container recovery - this will cause unmonitered containers
2. Container killed/failed
I am ok with second approach, but as per [~jlowe] {{The NM has to unregister
with a service as part of the container failure}} i don't see any solution for
such scenario. If this case we can handle separately, i can update patch based
on second approach
> NMLeveldbStateStore should be more tolerant of unknown keys
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-5547
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5547
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: nodemanager
> Affects Versions: 2.6.0
> Reporter: Jason Lowe
> Assignee: Ajith S
> Attachments: YARN-5547.01.patch
>
>
> Whenever new keys are added to the NM state store it will break rolling
> downgrades because the code will throw if it encounters an unrecognized key.
> If instead it skipped unrecognized keys it could be simpler to continue
> supporting rolling downgrades. We need to define the semantics of
> unrecognized keys when containers and apps are cleaned up, e.g.: we may want
> to delete all keys underneath an app or container directory when it is being
> removed from the state store to prevent leaking unrecognized keys.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
