[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15494159#comment-15494159
 ] 

Wangda Tan commented on YARN-3141:
----------------------------------

Thanks for review, [~templedf],
I addressed all your suggestions except:

bq. You axed the javadoc for SchedulerApplicationAttempt.isReserved()
isReserved is not used by anyone, so I removed that method

bq. It would be nice in the javadoc for all the methods that are no longer 
synchronized to note that they're MT safe. 
This is a good suggestion, but I think it's better to come in a separate patch, 
since we have to update almost every method in scheduler. 

Any other thoughts?

(Attached ver.3 patch)

> Improve locks in SchedulerApplicationAttempt/FSAppAttempt/FiCaSchedulerApp
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-3141
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3141
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: resourcemanager, scheduler
>            Reporter: Wangda Tan
>            Assignee: Wangda Tan
>         Attachments: YARN-3141.1.patch, YARN-3141.2.patch, YARN-3141.3.patch
>
>
> Enhance locks in SchedulerApplicationAttempt/FSAppAttempt/FiCaSchedulerApp, 
> as mentioned in YARN-3091, a possible solution is using read/write lock. 
> Other fine-graind locks for specific purposes / bugs should be addressed in 
> separated tickets.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to