[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15551786#comment-15551786
]
Rohith Sharma K S commented on YARN-5699:
-----------------------------------------
bq. Is this intentional ?
yes, because the same information also published by RM. So I think we can keep
at one place.
{code}
[
{
"events": [
{
"id": "YARN_RM_CONTAINER_FINISHED",
"timestamp": 1475469588288,
"info": {
"YARN_CONTAINER_STATE": "COMPLETE",
"YARN_CONTAINER_EXIT_STATUS": 0,
"YARN_CONTAINER_DIAGNOSTICS_INFO": ""
}
},
{
"id": "YARN_RM_CONTAINER_CREATED",
"timestamp": 1475469570721,
"info": {
"YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_PORT": 25006,
"YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_MEMORY": 1024,
"YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_PRIORITY": 0,
"YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_HOST_HTTP_ADDRESS":
"http://ctr-e29-1471411959733-0412-01-000004.hwx.site:25008";,
"YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_HOST":
"ctr-e29-1471411959733-0412-01-000004.hwx.site",
"YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_VCORE": 1
}
},
{
"id": "YARN_CONTAINER_CREATED",
"timestamp": -1,
"info": {}
},
{
"id": "YARN_CONTAINER_FINISHED",
"timestamp": -1,
"info": {
"YARN_CONTAINER_STATE": "RUNNING",
"YARN_CONTAINER_EXIT_STATUS": 0,
"YARN_CONTAINER_DIAGNOSTICS_INFO": ""
}
},
{
"id": "YARN_NM_CONTAINER_LOCALIZATION_FINISHED",
"timestamp": -1,
"info": {}
},
{
"id": "YARN_NM_CONTAINER_LOCALIZATION_STARTED",
"timestamp": -1,
"info": {}
}
],
"type": "YARN_CONTAINER",
"id": "container_e09_1475277121920_0010_01_000001",
"createdtime": -1,
"info": {
"YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_PORT": 25006,
"UID":
"yarn-cluster!application_1475277121920_0010!YARN_CONTAINER!container_e09_1475277121920_0010_01_000001",
"YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_MEMORY": 1024,
"SYSTEM_INFO_PARENT_ENTITY": {
"type": "YARN_APPLICATION_ATTEMPT",
"id": "appattempt_1475277121920_0010_000001"
},
"YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_PRIORITY": "0",
"YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_HOST":
"ctr-e29-1471411959733-0412-01-000004.hwx.site",
"YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_HOST_HTTP_ADDRESS":
"ctr-e29-1471411959733-0412-01-000004.hwx.site:0",
"YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_VCORE": 1
},
"configs": {},
"isrelatedto": {},
"relatesto": {}
}
]
{code}
bq. Container event publishing from RM is optional.
I see. But I think we should make it mandatory to publish from RM since some
information always get from RM like container_state. Otherwise we miss the this
information else container_state info should be published from NM. YARN-5156
removes from NM publisher.
> Retrospect yarn entity fields which are publishing in events info fields.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-5699
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5699
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Rohith Sharma K S
> Assignee: Rohith Sharma K S
> Attachments: 0001-YARN-5699.YARN-5355.patch, 0001-YARN-5699.patch
>
>
> Currently, all the container information are published at 2 places. Some of
> them are at entity info(top-level) and some are at event info.
> For containers, some of the event info should be published at container info
> level. For example : container exist status, container state, createdTime,
> finished time. These are general information to container required for
> container-report. So it is better to publish at top level info field.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
