[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15551786#comment-15551786 ]
Rohith Sharma K S commented on YARN-5699: ----------------------------------------- bq. Is this intentional ? yes, because the same information also published by RM. So I think we can keep at one place. {code} [ { "events": [ { "id": "YARN_RM_CONTAINER_FINISHED", "timestamp": 1475469588288, "info": { "YARN_CONTAINER_STATE": "COMPLETE", "YARN_CONTAINER_EXIT_STATUS": 0, "YARN_CONTAINER_DIAGNOSTICS_INFO": "" } }, { "id": "YARN_RM_CONTAINER_CREATED", "timestamp": 1475469570721, "info": { "YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_PORT": 25006, "YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_MEMORY": 1024, "YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_PRIORITY": 0, "YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_HOST_HTTP_ADDRESS": "http://ctr-e29-1471411959733-0412-01-000004.hwx.site:25008", "YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_HOST": "ctr-e29-1471411959733-0412-01-000004.hwx.site", "YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_VCORE": 1 } }, { "id": "YARN_CONTAINER_CREATED", "timestamp": -1, "info": {} }, { "id": "YARN_CONTAINER_FINISHED", "timestamp": -1, "info": { "YARN_CONTAINER_STATE": "RUNNING", "YARN_CONTAINER_EXIT_STATUS": 0, "YARN_CONTAINER_DIAGNOSTICS_INFO": "" } }, { "id": "YARN_NM_CONTAINER_LOCALIZATION_FINISHED", "timestamp": -1, "info": {} }, { "id": "YARN_NM_CONTAINER_LOCALIZATION_STARTED", "timestamp": -1, "info": {} } ], "type": "YARN_CONTAINER", "id": "container_e09_1475277121920_0010_01_000001", "createdtime": -1, "info": { "YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_PORT": 25006, "UID": "yarn-cluster!application_1475277121920_0010!YARN_CONTAINER!container_e09_1475277121920_0010_01_000001", "YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_MEMORY": 1024, "SYSTEM_INFO_PARENT_ENTITY": { "type": "YARN_APPLICATION_ATTEMPT", "id": "appattempt_1475277121920_0010_000001" }, "YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_PRIORITY": "0", "YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_HOST": "ctr-e29-1471411959733-0412-01-000004.hwx.site", "YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_HOST_HTTP_ADDRESS": "ctr-e29-1471411959733-0412-01-000004.hwx.site:0", "YARN_CONTAINER_ALLOCATED_VCORE": 1 }, "configs": {}, "isrelatedto": {}, "relatesto": {} } ] {code} bq. Container event publishing from RM is optional. I see. But I think we should make it mandatory to publish from RM since some information always get from RM like container_state. Otherwise we miss the this information else container_state info should be published from NM. YARN-5156 removes from NM publisher. > Retrospect yarn entity fields which are publishing in events info fields. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-5699 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5699 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Rohith Sharma K S > Assignee: Rohith Sharma K S > Attachments: 0001-YARN-5699.YARN-5355.patch, 0001-YARN-5699.patch > > > Currently, all the container information are published at 2 places. Some of > them are at entity info(top-level) and some are at event info. > For containers, some of the event info should be published at container info > level. For example : container exist status, container state, createdTime, > finished time. These are general information to container required for > container-report. So it is better to publish at top level info field. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org