Klaus Kaempf wrote:
> Ok, I did some tests on the timeout problem now. Here are the results:
>
> 1. The proposed patch (moving the connection.setTimeout() call after
> the connection.receive() call) is a *huge* improvement.
> Instead of ~15 secs, my testcase runs in fractions of a second.
Thanks for the testing! I'll submit the patch to SLE11 RC4.
[...]
> Ideally, the connection.receive() should handle the timeout and return
> either with a message (to be handled) or a timeout (shutdown service).
A good point, something for trunk/SP1...
> But coding DBus without glib seems to be black magic after all ... ;-)
Yes, even the DBus documentation says that ("If you use this low-level API
directly,
you're signing up for some pain."). :-)
--
Best Regards
Ladislav Slezák
Yast Developer
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUSE LINUX, s.r.o. e-mail: [email protected]
Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 960
190 00 Prague 9 fax: +420 284 028 951
Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
